Sunday 25 August 2013

Scientists amazed by how much dolphins remember

     Perhaps this could be one of the reasons why our club is named as Dolphins Club......Amazing fact abut dolphins.....


     A scientific study shows that dolphins are the animals with the greatest memory-storage capacity after humans, according to the British magazine Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

The research, carried out by a scientific team from the University of Chicago, found that dolphins were able to recognize the whistle of a former member of their school, even if it went its separate ways 20 years before.

According to the study, these long-term memories are a product of complex social connections that dolphins developed over their eons of evolution.

The scientists based their research on relations among 56 bottlenose dolphins in captivity, brought together from six different aquariums in the US and the Bermudas for breeding purposes.

They first recorded their whistles and, decades later, played the recordings back to them on underwater loudspeakers to observe the dolphins' reactions when they heard the call of animals they had not seen for many years.

"When the dolphins heard a call, they were much more likely to hang around the loudspeakers for a long time," research chief Jason Bruck said.

According to Bruck, finding that dolphins recall such old memories is an "unprecedented" phenomenon in the study of animal behaviour.

The most astonishing case for researchers involved two female dolphins, Bailey and Allie, that had lived together during the first years of their lives.

Bailey instantly recognized Allie's whistle 20 years and six months after they had last been in contact.

The scientists concluded that dolphins also have a great ability to recall certain events, which places their knowledge-storing ability at a level comparable to that of humans, chimpanzees and elephants.


Dolphins memory power

..............................Share your opinions......................................

Why investors are fearing emerging markets

     For more than a decade, investors loved emerging markets. Now many seem to fear them. 

     There have been sharp falls this month in several markets, from India to Turkey, reflecting concerns about weakening currencies. But even before those declines, emerging markets were underperforming relative to developed markets to an extent not seen since the Asian currency crisis of the late 1990s. 

The MSCI Emerging Market Index is down more than 10 per cent this year, while the world index, covering all developed markets, is up an equivalent amount. 

That disparity is not caused by one or two exceptional performers. Each emerging market has lost money this year. Among the 10 largest developed countries, all but two markets are up for the year, measured in US dollars to adjust for currency fluctuations. The exceptions are Australia and Canada, which came through the financial crisis relatively well and until recently had been prospering from exports of raw materials to emerging markets, particularly China. And both of them are up when measured in local currencies. 

The use of dollar figures hurts the reported performance of some emerging markets. The South African and Malaysian markets are up a little for the year, measured in local currencies, but down when measured in dollars. In India and Brazil, the local-currency market declines are less than half as large as the dollar-based figures shown. 

The Asian financial crisis, in which developing countries that had maintained fixed exchange rates were forced to abruptly devalue their currencies, turned out to have a lasting effect. Countries decided that it was critical to run balance of payments surpluses and to build up foreign currency reserves. The willingness of the United States and Europe to run large deficits helped. 

That stood the developing countries in good stead when the credit crisis erupted in 2008, but afterward, it became harder for the developing countries. Srinivas Thiruvadanthai, the director of research at the Jerome Levy Forecasting Center, notes that some of them, including India, Brazil and South Africa, are now running substantial deficits. 

The world as a whole cannot, of course, have a surplus or deficit in its balance of payments. And in 2012 the European Union ran its first annual surplus in more than a decade, while the deficit in the United States has declined. 

After the Asian crisis, emerging markets did very well. The MSCI Emerging Markets Index outperformed the MSCI World Index in every year from 2001 through 2007. It did worse in 2008, when all markets crumbled, but again did better in 2009 and 2010 as it became clear that emerging markets had fared much better than developed economies. 

For the decade from the end of 2000 through the end of 2010, the developed market index rose a scant 5 per cent. The Emerging Markets Index more than tripled during the same period. Since then, however, the developed markets have risen nearly 20 per cent, while the emerging ones have fallen about the same amount.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/global-markets/why-investors-are-fearing-emerging-markets/articleshow/22024767.cms

The Mahatma & Onion Satyagraha

    

        The current spike in onion prices is something that now seems to happen every second year. It makes one wonder about the inefficiency of agricultural production and distribution (in the home state of the Union minister for agriculture) — or perhaps at a higher efficiency which may deliver excellent profits to onion traders and their political patrons.

But the other oddity about the onion price rises and the pain they cause consumers, is that this happens in the one country with a major anti-onion tradition. Other countries have cuisines that don’t use much onion, and several are even more wary about garlic, but almost none have culinary traditions that ban them as absolutely as the Jain and Vaishnava Hindu ones.

If any country might seem best prepared for onion shortages it might be India, and yet it hits us hard. We seem neither able to abide nor avoid the alliums (onions, garlic and leeks)! Frederick Simoons, the cultural geographer, delves into this allium aversion in his book Plants of Life, Plants of Death. He notes that in ancient and modern times there has been “a widespread conviction that onions and garlic are tied to underworld forces, to darkness and evil.”

This obviously derives from their strong odour and tear-inducing power, which comes from the presence of compounds rich in sulphur, a mineral with pungent links to the deep forces of the earth. The gods of the underworld were to be feared and propitiated, and often, onions were the offering.

Strong taste and smell

As is often the case, these proscriptions may have had a practical basis — the smell of onions and garlic lingers on the breath, and in the centuries before proper dental hygiene, this was a real issue. Simoons notes specific proscriptions on their use in monastic communities where many people had to live close together — the Buddha, for example, is said to have banned their consumption by monks after he noticed one monk at a lecture sitting far apart from the others so as not to bother them with his onion breath.

And yet, alongside this dislike, a fascination with alliums existed in India, the sense that such strong taste and smell must have potent properties. Simoons notes the belief “that garlic and onions have aphrodisiac qualities [which] makes them inappropriate to persons, such as celibates, who are concerned with avoiding sexual stimulation at all times.”

This became linked to meat consumption, which was felt to have similar properties, and one can see how this could lead to further prejudice among certain orthodox Hindus since meat was a signal for anti-Muslim prejudice. Simoons notes allium aversion in the Muslim tradition too, since the Prophet is said to have disliked them, and one story described how when Satan was expelled from the Garden of Eden after the fall of man, “garlic sprang up from the place where his left foot had been, and the onion, from where his right foot had been.”

But this prejudice did not reach India since the food of the Muslim courts here, like that of the Mughals, became famous in the Islamic world for their use of onions, as in dishes like do-piaza, where onions were used twice. Farouk Mardam-Bey, in Ziryab, his collection of essays on Muslim food, refers to Morocco and India as the great “onion heavens.”

A shift clearly happened in India, with onions and garlic moving from being avoided to being seen as essential, and sometimes this can be seen with an individual, most notably Mahatma Gandhi. He was predisposed to dislike them, since he was born into a Vaishnava Hindu family and the importance of those values can be seen in his love for Narsingh Mehta’s beautiful hymn, Vaishnava Janato, which describes these values (but no mention of onions!).

He also grew up in a part of the country strongly influenced by Jain traditions, which forbade onions, along with all root vegetables. Gandhi had to eat onions when he went to Britain. Anne O’Connell’s book Early Vegetarian Recipes gives a good picture of the sort of food available in the vegetarian restaurants and Vegetarian Society meetings that Gandhi frequented.

Today, thanks to the wider availability of ingredients and spices, you can get good, tasty vegetarian food in the West, but at that time onions and garlic were among the few ways to add flavour to the basically stodgy food on offer. Gandhi acknowledged as much in a guide he wrote for other Indian students like him where, among the cheap and easy ways to fill oneself, he listed “soup made of potatoes, onions and haricots.”

His experiment with diets

Gandhi seems to have started avoiding onions and garlic again in South Africa. This was where he tried many experiments on his diet, and began his lifelong practice of communal living and celibacy. He did not specifically forbid onions and garlic for these reasons but it is notable how, in the collections of his writings on diet and health Key to Health and Diet and Diet Reform, mainly compiled from those early years, there is almost no mention of onions and garlic.

By the time he returned to India to start his work as a campaigner in the 1920s, he seems to have been avoiding them as much as he could. Reginald Reynolds, the young British man, who came to work at Sabarmati, and who would famously convey Gandhi’s letter to the viceroy announcing the start of the Dandi March, recalled in To Live in Mankind, his memoir of Gandhi, an incident when they were gifted a hamper of vegetables, including onions.

“They were still classified by ashramites as ‘stimulating food,’ enemies of Brahmacharya and almost too indecent to mention,” he writes. Gandhi’s other British disciple, Mirabehn, who had the ultra-orthodoxy of a convert, ordered them discarded, but Reynolds protested and was suddenly supported by Vallabhai Patel. “Reginald and I will eat them,” he said firmly and the two sat apart and ate the onions “viewed with some horror by our companions, rather as though we had been cannibals.”

'Onion thief’

Patel’s liking for onions should not come as a surprise since they had brought him to Gandhi. This was in 1918 in Kheda in Gujarat in one of Gandhi’s first attempts to use the satyagrahaconcept he had developed in South Africa in India, and in a specifically rural content. The British were insisting on collecting land tax despite failure of crops which, in that area, included onions.

The local collector, Frederick Pratt (who was the brother of Boris Karloff, the actor who created Frankenstein’s monster in the cinema) told Gandhi that land tax was the basis of British revenue in India, which made him realise the power of a campaign that refused to pay it. With the help of Patel, a young local lawyer, Gandhi led the farmers in refusing to pay the tax and when the British attacked their lands in revenge, he got one of them, Mohanlal Pandya, to harvest his crop of onions, which lead to his prosecution and conviction.

Pandya went to jail in triumph, hailed by Gandhi as “Onion Thief ” and hero of this Onion Satyagraha. Patel became a key associate of Gandhi after this, and the model was set for tax defiance to become a key weapon for satyagrahain India. Despite this practical demonstration of the powers of onions, Gandhi remained a non-consumer until the 1930s.

The shift that happened then seems to have been linked to his blood pressure, a hardly surprising condition given the stresses he was under, but an extra annoyance since he seems to have felt he should have been able to contain it with his diet. Since he would take no medicines, it had to be treated by some new food and his personal physician, Dr Ansari, suggested garlic.

This was backed up by Sushila Nayyar, the younger sister of his secretary Pyarelal, who was a medical student and would take over control of Gandhi’s health from Mirabehn. Nayyar was a firm believer in the value of garlic and onions and Gandhi went along with it: “The sin of the foul odour is on your head and also the sin of any harm that may come from its use,” he wrote to Nayyar in 1941. But he was already convinced of their powers and, typically, had started advocating them to others.

In a letter in 1936 to Subhas Chandra Bose, not yet politically estranged from him, he wrote that raw garlic and onion was much recommended in the West, and that he personally was taking raw garlic regularly: “It is the best antitoxin for internal use. It is also recommended for tubercular patients.” Many others, like GD Birla, Jayaprakash Narayan and Rajkumari Amrit Kaur, would also receive instructions to eat onions and garlic.

Change of heart

In that letter to Bose, Gandhi admitted Vaishnava prejudice against “these two harmless vegetables” arose from their foul odour. But he pointed to how “Ayurveda sings the praise of both unstintingly,” and also to a practical reason for his change of mind. “I do not know what villagers would do without garlic and onion,” he wrote, admitting its value for poor people with few other ways to make their food tasty.

It had the same value for visitors to his Wardha ashram where the food was very bland. Gandhi’s American biographer, Louis Fischer, complained about the lack of taste, but was happy to note he could ask for raw onions to stimulate his palate (though Gandhi tried to get him to have boiled ones). Gandhi would become such an advocate of garlic that Mabel Davis, a young English girl whose father, Godfrey Davis, was the ICS officer in charge of him during some of his jail sentences, recalled that the many foreign visitors who came to visit, and who often stayed with the Davises, came back smelling strongly of garlic.

In her memoir Dal and Rice she writes that Gandhi even convinced her father about the value of garlic and that, years later when retired in England, “Pa applied garlic to the beaks of his most beloved golden pheasants when they developed a severe cold… Miraculously they recovered.”

Gandhi might hardly have expected his changed views on onions and garlic would be used to benefit birds, but the fact of his change should be noted by the Indian government, and perhaps commemorated with a Mahatma Gandhi Kanda-Lasoon Yojana to prevent these periodic price rises that continue to hurt those Indians who, like Gandhi, remain devoted to devouring onions and garlic.


Rupee may gain this week on FM P Chidambaram's pep-talk

The rupee, which rebounded by a massive 135 paise last Friday, may continue to gain this week as investors hope government and Reserve Bank will make more efforts to stabilise the market, say treasury heads of banks. 

The domestic currency, which touched an intra-day low of 65.56 on August 22 on fear that the US Fed was on course to taper off its monthly asset purchase programme, recovered sharply on August 23 to end at 63.20 after the pep-talk by the finance minister on CAD and fiscal deficit. So far this fiscal, rupee has lost close to 20 per cent. 

"The rupee should continue with the Friday's trend of appreciation this week also. Investors hope the government and RBI are committed toward curbing volatility in the forex market," said Srinivasa Raghavan, treasurer at Dhanlaxmi Bank. 

Finance Minister P Chidambaram and senior ministry officials met top bankers and overseas investors over the weekend here and discussed fund-raising plans apart from allaying the fears of FIIs over capital control. 

After the meeting, Financial Services secretary Rajiv Takru told reporters that the measures to attract fund flows would be announced within a week or so. 

Economic Affairs Secretary Arvind Mayaram, who also accompanied Chidambaram, said, "There is no need to get excessively worried about funding CAD given the robust FDI inflows, which grew 70 per cent in Q1 year-on-year to USD 9 billion. 

"So, we think investment will begin to pick up and therefore one needs to continue to watch and see how we can get stability back on the rupee front." 

He also said outflows would be more than compensated by strong inflows. 

Last week, Chidambaram had said the rupee was undervalued and has overshot appropriate levels. He also asserted there is no need for excessive and unwarranted pessimism. 

Mayaram told reporters here that government was taking many structural reforms to finance the current account deficit and boost investors sentiment. 

"These reforms will begin to show results in the current year itself and we are hopeful that this will have a reflection on the growth that happens in the next three quarters," Mayaram told reporters. 

Outgoing RBI governor D Subbarao had said on Thursday that the forex reserves were enough to manage current situation of declining rupee, and RBI would take more measures to curb rupee volatility as and when necessary. 

However, some market participants expect the rupee to be range-bound and trade in the 62.50-64.50 level this week. "Fed concerns are here to stay. We may see RBI coming in on the rupee fall, but their presence may not be that strong as it was last week," said Agam Gupta, managing director and head of fixed income trading at Standard Chartered Bank. 

"Also, any fall to 64.50 will see exporters selling dollars," Gupta added. 

Dealers also expect that month-demand from oil importers may also weigh on rupee this week.



Will Rupee gain this week...


..............................share your opinions.............................

Rahul Gandhi says if India is a computer, then Congress is its default program

     
          True. But the processors are very slow. It is ineffective, It takes lots of time to finish any tasks. Do India need this programs in out system anymore? Uninstalling this programs will give any solutions ? still it is unclear...

Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi, while addressing a party workshop on social media said: "If India is a computer, then Congress is its default program." His observation is spot on, although not necessarily in ways complimentary to the Congress. In the 66 years of Independence, Congress prime ministers have run the country for almost 54 of them despite a lacklustre record. Countries such as South Korea or China, which were once on par with India, have pulled way ahead on most counts. Despite that, Congress still has a strong chance to influence the formation of the next government. That's just an indication of the paucity of ideas and absence of alternative visions in India's political landscape.

Congress's electoral success owes much to its template of cleverly using India's heterogeneity and contested history to cobble together winning combinations of social groups. The template has always been high on symbolism and rhetoric, and short of clear-cut plans. The ongoing drama over the food security Bill is an example. Not all political parties seem comfortable with its likely fallout, but none dare openly oppose it. Even the BJP's attempt to be different here is talk about a variant of the Congress proposal.

The strategy of exploiting India's diversity is the reason why most parties promote and campaign around issues of identity politics rather than of governance and development. Dynastic rule initiated by the Congress has also been imitated across the board — whether it's the SP in UP, DMK in Tamil Nadu or NCP in Maharashtra. The relative absence of political choice is the reason why there's widespread disenchantment with the political class as a whole. The voter looks jaded and cynical today as opinion polls project a hopelessly fragmented verdict for Lok Sabha elections in 2014. If imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, surely Congress is political India's default program. 




Rahul Gandhi's thoughts,,,

..................................please share your opinions.........................................



Google, Facebook can't flout Indian laws: Court

  The Delhi High Court has announced the verdict and It is necessary for Facebook and Google to follow the rules and they have made it clear.

     The Delhi High Court on Friday said that social networking site Facebook Inc and search engine Google Inc are bound by the rules of this country and cannot flout the law just because they are foreign companies.

A division bench of Acting Chief Justice B.D. Ahmed and Justice Vibhu Bakhru also directed the two companies to display on their websites the name and contact details of their grievance officers.

"We direct Google Inc and Facebook Inc to display the name of grievance officer on their respective sites. We also direct other intermediaries that the compliance (of the rules) be done in two weeks," the court said.

It said the Information Technology (Intermediaries) Rules mandate that all social networking sites have to publish the name of grievance officer and their contact details.

"Just because you are a foreign company, you cannot flout the law. Like us, you are bound by the rule of law of this country," said the court, also asking the central government to take steps to ensure that the social networking sites comply with the rules.

The bench also asked the central government to file its response on the allegations of petitioner that Delhi Police, Indian Railways and others have created accounts on social networking sites despite government departments being barred from doing so under the law.

The petitioner submitted that government departments like Delhi Police and the Indian Railways are not entitled to create accounts on social networking sites.

The court was hearing the PIL filed by former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader K.N. Govindacharya through his advocate Virag Gupta alleging that the websites have no mechanism for protection of children from online abuse.

The PIL has said that children below 18 years are entering an agreement with the social networking sites to open accounts which is against the Indian Majority Act, the Indian Contract Act and also the Information and Technology Act.

The plea has also sought recovery of taxes from the websites on their income from operations in India.


Times of India




....................your comments are welcome.........................



     

Early declaration of PM candidate to help BJP: Jaitley

             BJP leader Arun Jaitley on Saturday demanded that the party leadership should immediately declare its PM candidate honouring the sentiments of party cadre, in a not-so-subtle advocacy for Gujarat CM Narendra Modi. 

   Jaitley, who was speaking at a function to pay tribute to BJP's founder Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, argued that early declaration of the candidate would help the party in the coming elections. "We all are clear about it and so are party cadre. The sooner we move forward on the leadership issue, the better it will be," he said. 

     Although the Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha did not take names, the reticence may have been motivated by the concern not to infringe party chieg Rajnath Singh's instruction like desisting from making public pitches for Modi. His invocation of cadre sentiment left little doubt that his plea for an early decision was an argument for the early anointment of Modi who enjoys high rating among party's workers and sympathizers alike, which was cited by Rajnath Singh when he had appointed Gujarat CM the chairman of party's national campaign committee a few months ago. 

   Jaitley's remarks tied in with the estimate that leadership will find itself under pressure for a formal declaration in Modi's favour after the monsoon session of Parliament gets over. The BJP top brass, which appears to be vacillating over the leadership issue because of continuing resistance from some members of the parliamentary board, has justified the delay in announcing its candidate on the ground that doing so during the session would have shifted the focus away from UPA's alleged failures and misdeeds. 
  
    Arguing that it was time the party completed the formality of spelling out its leadership choice, Jaitley said that an early decision would help the party frame the battle for 2014 elections as a choice between dynastic politics of the Congress and proven leadership that the BJP offers. He said that the next election would be like a presidential contest where the aspirational class and those disappointed by the weak and indecisive leadership of Congress-led UPA, were likely to opt for a strong and capable leadership. "We will be better off if we offered them the choice now," he reasoned. 





................................................Your comments are welcome...................................................

A weaker rupee is not a bad thing

      
     A silver lining.....

      Over three months, the rupee has slid 15% against the dollar, which is surging against most other currencies worldwide. The reason: economic recovery in the US and the continued faith in the dollar as the reserve currency of the world.

In India, there are yelps of agony over the rupee's slide, as if its value against the dollar is some sort of measure of India's standing in the world. India's economy is now more open than it ever was and the rupee's movements are subject to the vagaries of traders worldwide.

And a little depreciation is not a bad thing. Exports have been sluggish for many months as the US and Europe struggled with their own woes and lower-cost nations such as Bangladesh chipped away at our share of textile and garment exports. That could change with a weaker rupee.

The biggest gainer, of course, would be software exporter TCS(BSE) 2.74 % as our analysis on Wednesday showed, followed by a clutch of software, auto and machinery manufacturers. What's good for exports is good for our current account deficit, which can narrow sharply on the back of this depreciation.

Remittances are expected to rise quickly, as Indians working overseas seize this window and send dollars back home.

Discretionary imports, like fine foods, personal care products and so on will be discouraged. And gold imports, a huge drain on foreign exchange reserves, are sure to get squeezed by higher rupee prices.

The government should now focus on reining in inflation, part of the reason for the rupee's weakness and likely to go up because of that weakening.

The Reserve Bank of India has done what it could by keeping interest rates fairly high, but a lot of inflation is related to administrative lapses. Release part of the 78-million-tonne grain mountain into markets to dampen food grain inflation, now at 17%.

Ask states to scrap the APMC Acts that keep farmers in the clutches of middlemen. Clear projects quicker, so that investment materialises. Do these things, the rupee will take care of itself. India has to get growth and investment going, first and foremost.




.............................................................Your comments are welcome.................................................

Economic Times

Management Mythos: Leadership lessons from the concept of Brahmanda

     This article shows how management and mythology are related. It also says how decision making is done and you all should read this interesting piece...

   Lets begin at the very beginning: how can mythology have any relationship to management? This question is rooted in our poor understanding of mythology. And this poor understanding stems from the treatment this subject received from scientists and academicians of the 18th century, most of whom hailed from Europe, and whose views still dominate our educated minds. This was long before scientists took the subject of psychology seriously.

Mythology is the study of stories, symbols and rituals valued by a culture. If there is a particular story that your organization celebrates and repeats again and again, it is aimed at constructing the myth of your organization. So then what is myth? Myth is subjective truth of a person, a people, a community or an organization; it is assumption that shapes decision-making, hence action plans. This makes it interesting for management.

Leadership is about decision making, but how do we take decisions?

If we assume that humans are rational creatures, then we assume decisions will be based on some objective data and influenced by a predictable outcome. But what if we assume that people — even the smartest of leaders — are not rational? Then the story changes. It is at this point that mythology rears it ancient head.

Take a look at how successful entrepreneurs are presented. More often than not they are presented as heroes. People who have changed the course of humanity material history: they have innovated incredible products, given employment to thousands of people, created incredible amounts of wealth. They are celebrated as gods. For this is exactly how the Greeks, later Romans, celebrated those who won the Olympic games or returned triumphant from battle. They had earned a place for themselves in the special heaven reserved for heroes — Elysium. Across management schools, professors act as bards singing their glory, explaining their exploits through case studies, stirring young minds to emulate them.

But no, we do not think of this as mythic. We are convinced this is reality. Try as we might, we cannot escape this bubble of mythology. Despite proclamations of living in a myth-free world, even the desire to break free from it, we end up in another myth bubble, what is technically called mythosphere — a set of assumptions that colours our view of the world, and serves as an invisible lever in our decision-making process. In Hindu mythology, this mythosphere is called Brahmanda, which means the egg of Brahma, the creator of this set of assumptions.

Our set of assumptions is informed by the stories, symbols and rituals we were exposed to as a child. Imagine a child growing up in a city where all roads turn at right angles, where there are clear traffic signals that everyone respects. Now imagine another child growing up in a city where roads come from every angle and traffic signals that everyone breaks. These two children live in a very different Brahmanda, one that trusts every system and the other that distrusts all systems. The developed world belongs to systemtrusting mythosphere while the developing world, especially India, belongs to system-distrusting mythosphere.

This leads to the thesis — to be developed you have to follow a system. From this thesis comes the conclusion — India is not developed because it has no system, it is chaotic. This conclusion comes from the assumption that to be a system, one needs to have central control - like the biblical God and his prophet leading his congregation of chosen people to the Promised Land. India functions on a different assumption - a system need not have central control; it can function with peripheral control as in nature, where there is no central control, but animals and plants are constantly in conflict negotiating their respective territories. Here the reliance is not on God out there but on God inside every human — Brahma, who creates his mythosphere, and is sensitive to the mythospheres of other Brahmas.



........................................................................................................Your comments are welcome 


Mythology vs Management

The realist v/s the visionary: What kind of a leader do we need in these troubled times?

    This article clearly speaks about how a corporate leader is supposed to be? Is he expected to be a visionary or a realistic person? It gives answer for all. I would like to share this news with all of you.

     As our country completes 66 years of corporate freedom, numerous challenges and questions stare India Inc in the face. 

In these times of uncertainty, what kind of a leader would you prefer - the hardcore realist who'll make you face facts, or the starry visionary who eggs you on to dream? 

Ploughing through hard times is easier when there is an inspiring vision on the horizon. And thus, it becomes important for leaders to instill hope rather than be doomsayers. "In times of economic uncertainty, leaders who are starry visionaries are needed more. Many mid-level and lowerlevel managers fail to understand that companies, which are built on strong fundamentals can weather any storm and phase of volatility. Those kinds of managers will benefit from a strong visionary leader who can give the confidence to the troops that the company will triumph at the end of such tough times," says Vikram Vuppala, CEO, NephroPlus. "The ability to dream and follow a vision is a powerful attribute and history shows that some of the great leaders were even greater visionaries," agrees Lt Gen Rajender Singh (retd), CEO, DLF Foundation. 

Visionaries are clearly the toast of the corporate world but every leader must be able to deliver reality checks when the situation demands. 

"In today's hard times, you need a leader who is data-driven but not milepost-driven. We are likely to miss the mileposts but the world doesn't come to an end," opines T Muralidharan, chairman, TMI Group. "Employees feel empowered under a visionary leader because he/she allows them to follow their dreams and in doing so, the leader successfully binds the team together with a sense of purpose. But along with being a visionary, one needs to be a realist as well to bring in focus to the team's functions, keep a timely check on the tasks and successfully get the strategies executed," emphasises Rohan Gupta, COO, Attero. 

However, Vuppala cautions, "A starry visionary leader such as Steve Jobs can push the organisation to great heights (almost impossible levels) by exhorting troops to realise a larger dream to change the world. But these leaders tend to be very impatient with subordinates who are not equally passionate or capable to realise the larger dream. Working with such leaders could be very tough for the non-star performers." 

Is there a place for both kinds of leaders at the top? "Both these kind of leaders have a different leadership approach towards working and tackling a particular situation. What really matters is how they use their qualities to turn the issue at hand to their advantage," avers Gupta. "Great leaders embody vitality , will, imagination, hope and a sense of energy. A leader is effective in manifesting his/her vision because he/she creates specific, achievable goals, initiates action and enlists the participation of others. A real leader sees possibilities before others and conveys a vision based on principles that lift humanity," concludes Anil Mithas, CMD, Unnati Fortune Group. 

Although most leaders tend towards one style, the best ones are those that can demonstrate both realism and inspiration. "The organisation needs to spend time and resources in grooming the potential leaders to have these two perspectives. Most of the time, we may find leaders who display one of the above traits, so that they can be groomed for the other one. However, in view of the current times, both the organisation and leader have to be flexible enough to play multiple roles simultaneously to ensure the organisational goals are achieved," shares Ashok Reddy, president - global HR and corporate affairs, Infotech Enterprises Ltd. 

"Visionaries respond to volatility by innovating organisational models and products that define the future. They motivate employees by showing them an exciting vision of the future. Realists often respond by focusing on strengthening the present and motivating the team through short-term achievements," remarks Padmaja Alaganandan, leader - people & change practice, PwC India. 

Thus, the leader has to be practical and a realist, yet must talk the language of a visionary.


.................................................................................................your comments are highly welcome.


Economic Times